On the Robustness of Anchoring Effects in WTP and WTA Experiments

نویسندگان

  • DAVID K. LEVINE
  • Nikolaos Georgantzis
  • Fabio Tufano
چکیده

* Fudenberg: Harvard University, Department of Economics, Littauer Center 310, 1805 Cambridge Street, Cambridge, MA 02138 (email: [email protected]). Levine: Washington University of St. Louis, Department of Economics, Campus Box 1208 St. Louis MO 63130-4899 (email: [email protected]). Maniadis: Bocconi University, Department of Decision Sciences and Carlo F. Dondena Center, Via Roentgen 1, Milan 20136, Italy (email: [email protected]). We thank Drazen Prelec for many helpful conversations, and for sharing the experimental instructions and data from Ariely, Lowenstein and Prelec (2003). We are also grateful to Tore Ellingsen and Oscar Bergman for sharing their instructions and data with us, and to Kathy Zeiler and for sharing the lottery data from Plott and Zeiler (2005). We would also like to thank Nikolaos Georgantzis, Fabio Tufano, Bill Zame, Charlie Plott and especially Jane Κlobas, for useful comments. NSF grants 0646816 and SES-08-51315 provided financial support.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

A new explanation for the WTP / WTA disparity

We propose a new explanation for the WTP/WTA disparity in experiments and surveys. Uncertainty, irreversibility and limited learning opportunities can generate commitment costs, driving a wedge between WTP and WTA. We present experimental evidence that supports our hypothesis.  2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

متن کامل

Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California 91125 the Willingness to Pay/willingness to Accept Gap, the "endowment Effect," Subject Misconceptions and Experimental Procedures for Eliciting Valuations

We conduct experiments to explore the possibility that subject misconceptions, as opposed to a particular theory of preferences referred to as the “endowment effect,” account for reported gaps between willingness to pay (“WTP”) and willingness to accept (“WTA”). Two facts are evident in the literature. First, there is no consensus regarding the nature or robustness of the WTA-WTP gap. Secondly,...

متن کامل

A Dynamic Explanation of the Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Accept Disparity

Recent evidence from laboratory experiments suggests that important disparities exist between willingness to pay (WTP) and compensation demanded for the same good. Because a fundamental postulate in neoclassical theory is that with small income effects and many available substitutes, the willingness to accept (WTA) and WTP measures of value for a commodity should be roughly equivalent, this fin...

متن کامل

Reference-dependent valuations of risk: Why willingness-to-accept exceeds willingness-to-pay

The gap between willingness-to-pay (WTP) and willingness-to-accept (WTA) benefit values typifies situations in which reference points—and direction of movement from reference points—are consequential. Why WTA-WTP discrepancies arise is not well understood. We generalize models of reference dependence to identify separate reference dependence effects for increases and decreases in environmental ...

متن کامل

Willingness-To-Pay and Willingness-To-Accept are Probably Less Correlated than You Think∗

Willingness to pay (WTP) and willingness to accept (WTA) a monetary amount for a lottery should be closely related. In data from an incentivized survey of a representative sample of 3,000 U.S. adults, we find that WTA and WTP for a lottery are, at best, weakly correlated. Across all respondents, the correlation is slightly negative. For the subgroups that we examine, the correlation is almost a...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2012